SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 103

Y.R.MEENA, B.M.MITRA
Commissioner of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Trustees of Keshav Mohta Family Trust – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. IN this instant application, the following question of law has been referred for our opinion :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a correct interpretation of Explanation (1) below Section 164(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the 'would be wife' of the minor satisfied the above condition and thereby directing the Assessing Officer to tax in the status of association of persons at the rate applicable to association of persons and not at the maximum marginal rate ?"

2. THE assessee is a trust which filed a return with the Income-tax Officer, SC-I, Calcutta, on July 29, 1980. The trust was settled with a trust deed dated March 27, 1979. From the trust deed it is seen that Shri Krishna Kumar Mohta settled Rs. 5,000 on the "would be wife" of the minor, Shri Keshav Kumar Mohta. Shri Krishna Kumar Mohta had made himself trustee jointly with Shri Narendra Kumar Mohta.

The source of income of the trust is share income from the firm, Mohta Marketing Syndicate, and income from share dealing. From the trust deed, it is further revealed that the income of the trust is to be kept for the purpose of the "wo









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top