SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 367

High Court of Calcutta
G.R. Bhattacharjee, J.
Puskar Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent
Decided On : Dec 07, 1994

Advocates Appeared:
Amit Bhattacharjee, Manas Ranjan Chakravarty

Section 173(8) CrPC is not 'suffocated' or rendered inapplicable by the West Bengal amendment of Section 167(5) CrPC, and a supplementary charge sheet can be filed even after the submission of the original charge sheet.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 167(5) AND SECTION 173(8) - INTERPRETATION - SCOPE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTARY CHARGE SHEET AFTER COMPLETION OF INVESTIGATION - WEST BENGAL AMENDMENT OF SECTION 167(5) - EFFECT ON SECTION 173(8) - HELD, SECTION 173(8) NOT OUSTED BY SECTION 167(5) - SUPPLEMENTARY CHARGE SHEET CAN BE FILED EVEN AFTER SUBMISSION OF ORIGINAL CHARGE SHEET.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, accused in a case under Sections 420/468/471 IPC and Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, challenged the order of the Magistrate accepting a supplementary charge sheet filed by the CBI after the submission of the original charge sheet.

Finding of the Court:

1. Section 167(5) CrPC prescribes specific periods for completion of investigation and mandates that if the investigation is not completed within the specified period, it has to be stopped and the accused discharged unless the Magistrate directs the investigation to continue beyond the prescribed period for special reasons and in the interests of justice. 2. Section 173(8) CrPC allows for submission of further report (supplementary charge sheet) after a charge sheet has been submitted on completion of investigation, if further evidence has been obtained upon further investigation. 3. The West Bengal amendment of Section 167(5) does not 'suffocate' or render Section 173(8) inapplicable, as they operate in different spheres and are not mutually exclusive. 4. Section 173(8) keeps the door open for securing the cause of justice by allowing the consideration of relevant evidence obtained after the submission of the original charge sheet.

Issues: 1. Whether Section 173(8) CrPC is 'suffocated' by the West Bengal amendment of Section 167(5) CrPC, rendering it inapplicable. 2. Whether a supplementary charge sheet can be filed even after the submission of the original charge sheet.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Section 167(5) CrPC and Section 173(8) CrPC operate at different stages of the investigation and trial process and are not mutually exclusive. 2. The purpose of Section 167(5) is to ensure completion of investigation within a specified period, while Section 173(8) allows for the consideration of further evidence obtained after the submission of the original charge sheet in the interest of justice. 3. The West Bengal amendment of Section 167(5) does not specifically exclude the operation of Section 173(8), and therefore, Section 173(8) remains applicable even after the amendment.

Final Decision: The revisional application was dismissed, and the Magistrate was directed to proceed according to law, considering the supplementary charge sheet and the evidence forwarded therewith.

Judgment

1. IN this revisional application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire proceedings as well as the impugned order dated 30th April, 1991 passed in G. R. 948 of 1988 pending in the court of the Third Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta. On the basis of a written complaint dated the 24th July, 1986 lodged by the Deputy Controller of Imports and Exports of Calcutta the C. B. I. , recorded the F. I. R. on the 5th August, 1986 under Sections 420/468/471 Indian Penal Code and Section 5 of the Imports Exports (Control) Act, 1947: After completion of investigation the C. B. I, submitted chargesheet on he 30th March, 1988 under Sections 420/468/471/120b I. P. C. The petitioner accused filed an application before the learned court below for discharge under Section 239 Cr. P. C. on the 23rd July, 1990. The learned court below took up the matter for consideration of framing of charge. The hearing in the matter continued on 21st August, 1990 and the next date for further hearing as I find, was fixed on 4th September, 1990. On 4th September, 1990 a supplementary charge sheet along with some papers was filed and the learned court below fixed 30th November, 1990 for hearing on the questions of the acceptance of the said supplementary charge sheet. The matter was thereafter directed to be fixed on 30th April, 1991 and on that date by the impugned order the learned court below, after going through the case record and after hearing the learned special p. P., directed the supplementary charge sheet to be treated as part of the original charge sheet and then fixed a date for hearing of the petition of the accused for discharge under Section 239 Cr. P.C. It is needless to mention here that the question whether the accused is to be discharged under section 239 Cr. P. C. or any charge is to be framed under Section 240 cr. P.C. refers to the same composite stage of the procedure where the magistrate has to consider the question whether charge is required to be framed against the accused or he has to be discharged.

2. THE point raised before me on behalf of the petitioner accused is that in view of the amended provisions of Section 167 (5) Cr. P. C. as applicable in west Bengal there is no scope of filing any supplementary charge sheet once a charge sheet has been submitted after completion of investigation. It is the argument of the learned Advocate far the petitioner that accordingly the learned court below can not take into consideration the supplementary charge sheet or the materials referred to therein while considering the question of framing of charge in this case. Section 173 (8) Cr. P.C. of course contemplates submission of further report (commonly termed as supplementary charge sheet) after a charge sheet has already been submitted on completion of investigation. As regards Sub-section (8) of section 173 it is the submission of the learned Advocate for the petitioner, to quote his own language, that the said Sub-section (8) of Section 173 stands 'suffocated' by the West Bengal amendment of Section 167 (5)Cr. P. C. and therefore, so far as West Bengal is concerned, once charge sheet has been submitted after completion of investigation there is no scope of filing any supplementary charge sheet under Section 173 (8) Cr. P. C. The original Sub-section (5) of section 167 Cr. P. C. runs thus:

"167 (5) If in any case triable by a Magistrate as a summons-cae the investigation is not concluded within a period of six months form the date on which the accused was arrested, the Magistrate shall make an order stopping further investigation into the offence unless the officer making the investigation satisfied the Magistrate that for special reasons and in the interests of justice the constitution of the investigation beyond the period of six months is necessary."

3. THE said Sub-section (5) of Section 167 was however substituted by the West Bengal Act 24 of 1988 with effect from 2nd May. 1989 by the following provisions:

"(5), If, in respect






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top