SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 18

A.K.SENGUPTA, Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee
S. P. Jaiswal Estates Pvt. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income-Tax – Respondent


Judgment

Ajit K. Sengupta, J.

1. IN this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1978-79, the following question of law has been referred to this court:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that extra shift depreciation allowance for triple shift working was not available to the assessee's approved hotel ?"

2. THE facts leading to this reference are stated hereinafter. The assessee is a private limited company and derived income from hotel business. The assessee's hotel is an approved one. According to the assessee, its hotel worked triple shift during the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration. The assessee claimed before the Income-tax Officer extra shift depreciation allowance for triple shift working. This claim was disallowed by the Income-tax Officer on the ground that the assessee is entitled to extra depreciation allowance under sub-item (iii) of Item No. III of Part I of Appendix I of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, being an approved hotel and as such extra shift allowance for triple shift working was not available to it under sub-item (iv) thereof.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top