SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 3

A.K.SENGUPTA, Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Economic And Entrepreneurship Development Foundation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bajoria

Judgment

Ajit K. Sengupta, J.

1. IN this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1982-83, the following question of law has been referred to this court:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income of the health centre owned by the assessee is exempt under Section 10(22A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?"

The facts leading to this reference are stated hereinafter : The assessee was registered under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, on December 23, 1971. It is engaged in running a health centre for the benefit of persons suffering from illness or requiring medical attention or rehabilitation. It also derives income from business in contracts. It appeared that the assessee was being treated as a charitable institution and its income was being exempted under Section 11 of the Act. During the year under consideration, the income-tax Officer held that the assessee was not entitled to the exemption under Section 11 of the Act because the provisions of Section 13(2) of the Act were infringed. The assessee had also claimed, alternatively, exemption under Section 10(22A) of the Act in respect of income derived from the he






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top