SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Cal) 457

J.N.Hore
Jacob Cherian – Appellant
Versus
Himanshu Kumar Mukherjee – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhaskar Bhattacharjee, Bhaskar Ghosh, Bimal Chatterji, Pradyumna Sinha, S.P. Roychowdhury

Judgment

1. THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26th June, 1988 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 7th Court, Alipore, in Title Appeal No. 197/87 affirming those dated 27th January, 1987 passed by the learned Munsif, 2nd Court, Baruipur in Title Suit no. 223/86.

2. THE plaintiff-respondents instituted the said suit against the tenant-defendant for eviction upon determination of the tenancy by a notice to quit under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. The tenancy was governed by the Transfer of Property Act and not by the West Bengal Premises Tenancy act. The defendant was a monthly tenant in respect of the suit premises at a monthly rate of Rs.80 payable according to English Calendar month. Though redundant, the plaintiff pleaded default in payment of rent since January, 1974, unauthorised construction by way of addition or alteration in the suit premises without knowledge and consent of the plaintiffs and reasonable requirement of the suit premises for their own use and occupation as grounds of ejectment. The defendant contested the suit toy filing a written statement. The defence case was that on 27. 9. 84 S. D. Mukherjee received a




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top