SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 284

S.P.Rajkhowa
Chitra Lekha Banerjee – Appellant
Versus
Rana Banerjee – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Balai Chandra Roy, D.P. Adhikari, C.R. Das, D.P. Sengupta, Subhasish Roy

Judgment

Siba Prasad Rajkhowa, J.

1. THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated 30th May, 1990 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah in Misc. Case No. 152 of 1989 Under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. By this impugned order the learned Magistrate has allowed the prayer for maintenance in part. He has granted allowance at the rate of 300/- per month from the date of application to the petitioner as maintenance for her minor son but has refused maintenance to the petitioner herself.

2. PETITIONER Smt. Chitralekha Banerjee filed the application Under Section 125 Cr. P.C. on 11.8.89 claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month for herself and at the rate of Rs. 300/- per month for her minor child from her husband Rana Banerjee who was arrayed as the opposite party on the grounds of physical torture, mental cruelty and refusal by the opposite party to maintain her and the child. The claim was resisted by the opposite party. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, upon consideration of the evidence on record, has held that the petitioner has failed to show that she has been neglected or refused to be maintained by her husband and t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top