1991 Supreme(Cal) 247
High Court of Calcutta
Susanta Chatterji, J.
Diljit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Collector – Respondent
C.O. 5297 of 1989
Decided On : May 08, 1991
S. Pal, Mita Mukherjee, D. Pal, R.N. Dutta, S.N. Datta, S.A.M. Habibullah, Gaytri Chowdhury
The procedure as envisaged under sections 30 to 36 of the Bengal Excise Act is mandatory and must be followed before granting or renewing a licence for an excise shop.
Headnote:
EXCISE ACT - SECTIONS 30 TO 36 - LICENCE RENEWAL - PROCEDURE - OBJECTIONS - CONSIDERATION - MANDATORY:
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, owner of the premises, challenged the notification holding hearing and enquiry by the Additional District Magistrate for grant of licence to respondent no. 5 for running 'Off and On' liquor shops at the ground floor of the premises, contending that the objections raised by her were not properly considered.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Additional District Magistrate did not properly consider the objections raised by the petitioner and simply relied on a letter from an MLA stating 'no objection' to the running of 'Off and On' shops at the site. The Court held that the procedure as envisaged under sections 30 to 36 of the Bengal Excise Act had to be followed as directed by a previous judgment of the Court.
Issues: 1. Whether the Additional District Magistrate properly considered the objections raised by the petitioner before granting the licence to respondent no. 5? 2. Whether the procedure as envisaged under sections 30 to 36 of the Bengal Excise Act was followed?
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the Additional District Magistrate did not properly consider the objections raised by the petitioner and simply relied on a letter from an MLA stating 'no objection' to the running of 'Off and On' shops at the site. The Court held that the procedure as envisaged under sections 30 to 36 of the Bengal Excise Act had to be followed as directed by a previous judgment of the Court.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the writ petition by quashing the impugned notification and the steps taken by the authorities to grant excise licence both for 'Off' and 'On' shop at no. 3, G. T. Road, Asansol to the respondent no. 5.
S. Chatterji, J.
1. THE present writ petition has been filed challenging the Notification vide Memo No. 917(2)/E(W) dated 18.3.89 holding the hearing and enquiry by the respondent no. 2 the Additional District Magistrate, Asansol and to restrain the respondent no. 1 the Collector and the District Magistrate, Burdwan from acting in furtherance of the hearing held on 20. 3. 1989 and/or acting in any manner in continuation of the proceeding and/ or issuing the licence thereof and other consequential reliefs as stated in the writ petition itself. It is stated in detail that the petitioner is the owner of the premises no. 3, G. T. Road (previously known as old 48, G. T. Road) at Asansol, District Burdwan and all the floors were let out to Joginder Singh Attwal since deceased. THE portion within the first floor and the second floor were vacated in terms of a decree of Civil Court. THE said Joginder Singh Attwal since deceased allegedly carried on business on the ground floor of the said premises in the trading name "Attwal Brothers" as retail sellers of foreign liquors (wines) on the strength of an "off" licence issued in the name of Joginder Singh Attwal. THE petitioner allegedly filed two separate suits for eviction and obtaining possession with regard to the first floor and second floor. She filed a separate suit for eviction regarding the ground floor before the Subordinate Judge at Asansol being Title Suit No. 46 of 1977 and the same is still pending for decision. It is further alleged that Joginder Singh Attwal since deceased had been running 'off' and 'on' licences for foreign liquor in the first and second floors and thereafter was allowed and granted licences by the Excise Authority to shift the 'on' licence in the ground floor and carry on both 'off' and 'on' licences in the said floor of the premises in- spite of objection raised by the petitioner and the bank authorities who came to occupy as, tenants in the said premises. Being aggrieved by the, said purported action of the authorities concerned the petitioner filed a writ application before this Court and by Order dated 31st January, 1983 Chittotosh Mookherjee J. (As His Lordship then was) was pleased to dispose of the matter giving liberty to the petitioner to file objection before the renewal of the licences afresh and the Licensing Authority was directed to consider and dispose of the objection filed by the petitioner in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitioner filed objection dated March 18, 1983 before the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and prayed for a personal hearing in accordance with law. THE petitioner, was, however, given an opportunity of hearing on 13th April, 1983 and before that the respondent no. 1 renewed the said licence for 20 (twenty) days without considering the objection of the petitioner. However, the petitioner being aggrieved by the grant of provisional licence which is alleged to be illegal, unjust and mala fide moved this Court by filing another writ application and B. C. Roy J. (As His Lordship then was) issued a Rule Nisi and granted an interim order restraining the private respondents to carry on the business of foreign liquor "On and Off" until the licence is renewed and granted in accordance with law. It is placed on record that on 22nd of December, 1988 the said Rule being C. R. No. 4876(W) of 1983 came up for final hearing before Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee J. and the Rule was disposed by directing the respondent no. 1 to consider and. hear ,any objection that may be filed by the persons who are competent. There was a specific direction that the matter should be considered and/or heard by the Collector himself. It is further placed on record that pursuant to the order of Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee J., an objection was filed on 10th of January, 1989 stating inter alia that in any case Sanjiv Atwal son of Joginder Singh Atwal should not obtain any licence to carry on "off and On" business within the premises no. 3, G. T. Road (Old