SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 236

N.P.Singh, Altamas Kabir
Marine Engineer – Appellant
Versus
Siddeswar Halper – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhijit Banerji, Asim Mukherji, Ila Chatterji, N.C. Roy Chaudhary, R.N. Mitra

Judgment

1. THESE appeals have been filed for setting aside judgments of a learned Judge allowing two writ applications filed on behalf of the two petitioners (hereinafter referred to as "the petitioners".

2. THE writ applications had been filed making a grievance that the Marine Engineer, Marine Organisation, Farakka Barrage project, after having accepted the highest tenders offered by the petitioners for the sale of the two Floating Derrick cranes, cancelled the said acceptance without assigning any reason. An advertisement was published by the Marine Engineer in different newspapers on 24.9.88 inviting tenders from the Seraf Dealer/re roller/contract ors for the sale of the marine crafts which included two Floating Derrick Cranes lying on the up-stream Marine site office, Farakka. Pursuant to the said advertisement the two petitioners, viz., Shri shiddeswar Haider and Paramananda Chowdhury submitted their tenders in respect of the two Derrick Cranes, It is an admitted position that the tenders submitted on behalf of the petitioners were the highest. In due, course they ware forwarded to the Superintending Engineer' by the Marine Engineer for approval. The Superintending Engineer









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top