SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 479

A.K.CHATTERJEE, Prabuddha Sankar Banerjee
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
Sanwarmal Modi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Promode Ranjan Roy, Dipak Kumar Mukherjee

Judgment

A.K. Chatterjee, J.

1. THIS appeal by special leave under section 378(4), Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the acquittal of the respondent who had faced a trial before a competent Magistrate on charges under section 135 (b) (ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 and section 85 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 on the allegations that 6n the 19th March, 1974 at about 9 a.m., his bedroom at premises No. 10, Tara Chand Dutta Street, Calcutta was searched by the officials of Calcutta Customs and a gold bar Ext. I, of foreign origin weighing 116.60 gms, a gold stick Ext. II, weighing 67.70 gms, eight pieces of sovereigns Ext. III weighing 63.55 gms and three pieces of gold Ext. IV weighing 21.30 gms. were recovered from an almirah, the key of which was produced by the respondent. As he could not explain his possession of gold of foreign origin and primary gold, it was seized under a seizure list Ext. 10 and on the same date he made a voluntary statement Ext. 7, under section 108 of the Customs Act wherein he admitted the search and seizure made by the Customs Officers as indicated above.

2. AT the trial, the respondent took the defence that the gold bar Ext. I, was purchased b







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top