SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Cal) 175

Mitra
Dwarkadas Raghiubir Prosad Choudhuri – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ajay Kumar Nanda, Ajit Kumar Ray, Goutam Dirghangi, Sadananda Ganguly

JUDGMENT

1. IN this revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petition has challenged two orders, one being Order No. 134 dated September 18, 1986 by which his application under Section 17 (2) and 17 (2a) of the West Bengal premises Tenancy Act,1956 were disposed of by the learned Munsif determining the arrears of rent as Rs. 750. 24 from April, 1976 to September, 1978 without taking into consideration the period of default subsequent to the filing of the said applications and also without determining the entire arrears of rent payable upto the date or? which the said order was made together with interest and the Order No. 145 dated January 19, 1987 by which application filed by the petitioner under Section 17 (1) of the aforesaid Act together with an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure read,section 5 of the Limitation Act, were rejected.

2. THE opposite party instituted Title Suit No. 83 of. 1977 in the court of the learned Munsif at Purulia, subsequently re-numbered as title Suit No. 78 of 1986 Of the court of the learned Assistant district 3udge, Purulia for eviction of the petitioner from the suit premises, inter alia on











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top