SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 5

M.K.MUKHERJEE
Mrinalini Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Shibnath Bhadra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Biswa Ranjan Ghosal, Krishna Ghosh,

JUDGMENT

(1.) IN this application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as also under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the three petitioners pray for quashing of the proceeding of R. C. Case No. 103 of 1976 initiated against them on a complaint filed by the opposite party under section 31 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and now pending before the Additional Rent Controller Barrackpore.

(2.) IN the complaint it has been stated that Mrinalini Ghose, the petitioner No. 1, is the owner of premises No. P-236,/ Lake town and the complainant is a tenant in respect of a flat on the first floor of the said premises. The other two petitioners are the sons of the petitioner No. 1. The petitioners stopped the water supply to the complainant flat no November 11, 1976 which was temporarily restored at the intervention of the Officer-in-Charge of Lake town Police Station. On December 11, 1976 there was a reduction in the supply of water and on December 13, 1976 the three petitioners completely stopped the water supply thereby causing great inconvenience to the complainant.

The learned Rent Controller, barrackpore enter









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top