SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 136

P.K.Banerjee
Bimal Sadhan Koley – Appellant
Versus
Nikhilesh Koley – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Debaprasad Mukherjee, R.P.Bagchi, S.Dinda, Smritikana Mukherjee

JUDGMENT

1. THE question in this Rule for our consideration is that when a transfer is made in respect of number of plots by one of the co-sharers of his undivided share, section 8 of the West Bengal land Reforms Act will apply and moreover what is the amount the pre-emptor will have to deposit if he wants only to pre-empt one of the several plots sought to be sold. Both the courts held against the petitioner. Hence the revision application at the instance of the applicant for pre-emption.

2. MR. Bagchi, on behalf of the plaintiff contended that he wants to pre-empt only one portion of the plot which is an agricultural land and he has deposited the sum which will be the market value of the said plot. It is argued by Mr. Bagchi that the price of one holding which has been deposited is quite sufficient and the petitioner may not be directed to deposit the consideration money for the one transaction because a number of plots were considered and only one plot was sought to be pre-empted.

Mr. Mukherjee on behalf of the opposite parties, however, contended that the petitioner purchased l/3rd undivided share of C. S. Plot No. 1070 along with other plots, therefore, they must not be co-sh






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top