1. IN this Rule, the petitioner challenges the legality and -or validity of the initiation of a proceeding for further revision of a record -of -rights prepared upto the stage of attestation by inserting the name of respondent No. 4 as bargadar. The petitioner contends that under- section 51 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, steps x for preparation and or revision of the record -of -rights was taken by the se element authorities and various stages for the preparation of record of rights in respect of the disputed lands have also been completed. After following the procedures as laid down in Rule 22 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Rules read with Schedule 'a' there under, the record -of -rights in respect of the disputed lands was attested by the competent Revenue Officer authorised under section 51 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act on March 4,1977 and, in such record -of- rights the names of the petitioners; were recorded as Raiyats. But there; was no barga recording in the said attested record -of -rights in favour of any person or in favour of the said respondent; No. 4. The petitioners contend that subsequently the petitioners were surprised to receive a notice fr