High Court Of Calcutta
M.M. Dutt, M.K. Mukherjee, JJ.
Administrator West Bengal Board Of Secondary Education – Appellant
Versus
Abinash Chandra Bhadra – Respondent
Decided On: June 01, 1982
UDAYAN INSTITUTION FOR GIRLS - RECOGNITION OF SCHOOL - SUPERSESSION OF MANAGING COMMITTEE - APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATOR - PAYMENT OF SALARIES TO TEACHING AND NON-TEACHING STAFF - RIGHT TO CLAIM GRANTS-IN-AID - WRIT PETITION - TEMPORARY MANDATORY INJUNCTION - BALANCE OF CONVENIENCE AND INCONVENIENCE - [RULES 8 (2), 8 (3) OF THE MANAGEMENT OF RECOGNISED NON-GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS (AIDED AND UNAIDED) RULES, 1969].
Fact of the Case:
Udayan Institution for Girls, a recognized secondary school, was superseded by the Board and an Administrator was appointed. The Managing Committee challenged the supersession and obtained a temporary injunction restraining the Board from interfering with their functioning. The school was shifted to a new address and a new school with the same name was started at the old address. The Board published a notice stating that only the school at the new address was affiliated to the Board. The Managing Committee filed a writ petition seeking payment of salaries, dearness and other allowances of the teaching and non-teaching staff of the school.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Udayan Institution for Girls at 16, Gomes Lane, Calcutta was a recognized secondary school and the Board had no jurisdiction to withdraw or recall its affiliation or recognition. The court also held that the respondents had a legal right to claim payment of salaries, dearness and other allowances of the members of the teaching and non-teaching staff of the school, as the Government had introduced a scheme for free education of boys and girls upto class X in West Bengal and directed all recognized secondary schools not to realise tuition fees from students.
Issues: 1. Whether the Udayan Institution for Girls at 16, Gomes Lane, Calcutta was a recognized secondary school? 2. Whether the Board had jurisdiction to withdraw or recall the affiliation or recognition of the school? 3. Whether the respondents had a legal right to claim payment of salaries, dearness and other allowances of the members of the teaching and non-teaching staff of the school?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the Udayan Institution for Girls at 16, Gomes Lane, Calcutta was a recognized secondary school as there was no specific order withdrawing the affiliation or recognition of the school. 2. The court held that the Board had no jurisdiction to withdraw or recall the affiliation or recognition of the school, as such withdrawal would interfere with the functioning of the Managing Committee of the school under the Board. 3. The court held that the respondents had a legal right to claim payment of salaries, dearness and other allowances of the members of the teaching and non-teaching staff of the school, as the Government had introduced a scheme for free education of boys and girls upto class X in West Bengal and directed all recognized secondary schools not to realise tuition fees from students.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and directed the appellants to make payment of salaries, dearness and other allowances to the members of the teaching and non-teaching staff of the Udayan Institution for Girls at 16, Gomes Lane, Calcutta, with effect from January 1, 1980 up to the month of June, 1982, within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.
1. THIS appeal has been preferred by the State of West Bengal and three others against the judgment of B. C. Ray J dated January 11, 1982, whereby the learned Judge made absolute the Rule Nisi issued on the application of the respondents under Article 226 of the Constitution
2. THE respondents, who were the writ petitioners, are the members of the Managing Committee of Udayan institution for Girls, situate at 16, Gomes Lane, Calcutta. It is the case of the respondents that the ' said school was founded by the respondent no. 4, Shri parbati Charan Sen Gupta. The school was recognised as a class X school by the West. Bengal Board of Secondary education, hereinafter referred to as the Board, in the year 1965. The recognition was extended from time to time. After the special constitution of the Managing Committee of the school was approved by the Board, the Managing committee of the school was constituted on July 2, 1967 with the respondents as the members thereof. After the Management of the Recognised Non-Government Institutions (Aided and Unaided) Rules, 1969 was framed, hereinafter referred to as the said. Rules, the school made an application on September 22, 1969 for the approval of the special constitution of the Managing Committee of the school under Rule 8 (2) of the said Rules. It appears that the Board allowed the Managing Committee to continue until further direction or decision of the Board. On September 23, 1969, the Director of Public Instruction, west Bengal, recommended the approval of the special constitution of the school. Thereafter, an inspection of the school was held by the District Inspector of Schools, and he submitted a report. On such report, the Director of public Instruction withdrew his recommendation for the approval of the special constitution of the Managing committee of the school and recommended the supersession of the Managing committee on February 4, 1975. Pursuant to the said recommendation, the president of the Board issued an order dated December 18, 1975 superseding the managing Committee of the school and appointed one Shri P. C. Roy Chowdhary, Administrator, to take charge of the school.
Being aggrieved by the said order of supersession, the respondents instituted a suit being Title Suit no. 2223 of 1975 before the 8th Bench. City civil Court. Calcutta against the reward and its President and Deputy Secretary and the said Administrator P. C. Roy Chowdhury, inter aha, praying for a declaration that the said order of supersession was illegal and invalid and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from giving any effect Or further effect to the said order of supersession and from in any manner, interfering with the functions of the plaintiffs, (the respondents herein) and the members of the Managing committee of Udayan Institution for girls. During the pendency of the suit, on May 29, 1976, the order of supersession dated December 18, 1975 was withdrawn and recalled and a fresh order of supersession was made by the President of the Board on the ground of expiry of the term of the Managing Committee of the school. By the said order, the said P. C. Roy Chowdhury was again appointed Administrator of the school. Upon the withdrawal of the previous order of supersession and the passing of a fresh order of supersession, the respondents, by an amendment of the plaint challenged the subsequent order of supersession. It is the case of the appellants that the Administrator after he had taken over charge of the school on June 6, 1976, was obstructed by the respondents in discharging his duties as the Administrator and, accordingly, he shifted the school from 16, gomes Lane, Calcutta to 16, Noor Mohammad Lane, Calcutta on January 11, 1977. It. appears that on January 21, 1978. the Board made a publication in the Ananda Bazar Patrika, the English rendering of which is as follows :-
"The address of the Udayan Institution for Girls, a girl school affiliated to the Board, is at 16, Noo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.