SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Cal) 423

A.K.Sen, S.N.Sanyal
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
Sanchaita Investment – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gautam Chakraborty, Anindya Mitra, Pradyot Mullick, A.L. Poddar

Judgment

ANIL K. SEN, J.

1. IN terms of an order dated September 27, 1963, passed by the Supreme Court of India in Writ Petition Nos. 638, 757 to 800 of. 1883 (sm. Chanara Seth and Ors. vs. Union of India and Ors.) we were nominated the Division Bench by the learned Chief Justice of this court for the purpose of adjudicating upon objections to the attachment made by the Commissioner of Sanchaita Investments so appointed by the Supreme Court by the order dated May 41,1983, passed in the said writ petitions, On April 24, 1984, the said Commissioner having attached the 5th floor and the corresponding four covered car parking spaces on the basement in the multiatoreyed building at 113, Park Street, Calcutta, an objection was preferred by the Punjab National Bank. Such an objection was preferred by the Punjab National Bank firstly before the Commissioner and secondly on an application before us filed on June 13, 1884. The Commissioner having forwarded the said objection we have heard the objection on notice to and in the presence of the objector, the Commissioner and Anandi Lal Poddar and Sons Limited. in order to consider the objection it would be necessary to refer to certain facts whic




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top