SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Cal) 3

A.K.SENGUPTA
Dayaleswar Mahadeb Jew – Appellant
Versus
Junior Land Reforms Officer Balughata – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.N. Maity, Radheshyam Maitra, Subal Chandra Moitra

Judgment

1. IN this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, being three several deities represented by shebajt, have challenged the Judgments and Orders dated 14th August, 1976, 16th August, 1976 and 13th October, 1976 in 7a Forms L. R. Case nos. 201, 202 and 203 of 1976 passed by the Revenue Officer, Mahishadal Thana, settlement Camp, the Respondent No. 3, under Section 14 (1) (3) read with Section 14 (M) (5) of the West Bengal Land Reforms act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the land Reforms Act..

2. IN the said impugned Judgments and orders the Revenue Officer held that the family of the shebait has retained land as per ceiling provided by the Land Reforms act and as such the lands owned by the endowment concerned other than of a public nature shall be deemed to be lands owned by the beneficiary and the beneficiary shall be deemed to be a raiyat under the Land Reforms Act, who is not entitled to retain any further land in view of the ceiling provision under the Land Reforms Act. The case of the petitioners is that by a registered Deed of Gift and/or the Arpannama dated 14th July, 1893, one Smt. Bichitrimoyee Dassi, since deceased, gifted and








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top