SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 377

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Premchand Sitanath Roy – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
S.Bhattacharya, B.L.Pal, N.L.Pal, P.N.Mukharji

JUDGMENT

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.

1. IN this application under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner challenges the notice under Section 263 of the INcome-tax Act, 1961, issued by the Additional Commissioner of INcome-tax, West Bengal-Ill, for the assessment year 1968-69. The assessee submitted his return for the assessment year 1968-69 on the 14th of May, 1969. Therefore', under proviso (iii) of Sub-section (1) of Section 139, the petitioner was liable to pay penal interest for the period 1st of January, 1969, to 14th of May, 1969, at the rate of 9% per annum on the amount of tax payable in the status of unregistered firm for the said assessment year. Under Sub-section (8) of Section 139, the INcome-tax Officer had discretion to reduce or waive the interest payable in accordance with law and under conditions mentioned under Rule 117A of the INcome-tax Rules, 1962. The INcome-tax Officer did not charge any interest in terms of Section 139(1) of the said Act. According to the petitioner interest was not charged because of the demise of the two senior partners of the petitioner-firm. According to the petitioner the representation of the petitioner was duly submitted before the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top