SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 211

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Kamal Srimal – Appellant
Versus
Padam Chand Sindhar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Anindya Mitra, Bholanath Sen, S.Pal, Somnath Chatterji

JUDGMENT

1. THE facts, in the instant case, are a little intriguing and the points involved are movel. This is an application for revocation of leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent and for certain other consequential reliefs. Sm. Kamal srimal is the daughter of Padam Chand sindhar. Sm. Kamal Srimal instituted a suit against the respondent in this court being suit No. 209 of 1977. In the plaint, the plaintiff tells the story that she is the daughter of the defendant and that the defendant had deposited with her a sum of Rs. 50,000/- and a further sum of Rs. 28,000/- at Calcutta within the jurisdiction of this Court on 4th February 1974 and 13th June, 1975, respectively. The said sums were repayable after 12 years from the respective dates of deposit with simple interest. The plaintiff claims that she is a business-lady of repute and has been carrying on business on a substantial scale. During the year 1974, the plaintiff's husband was the Managing Director of certain company and he had to travel to delhi and the plaintiff used to accompany him. The plaintiff had a Saving's Bank account with the Bank of Baroda, New Delhi. Certain cheque leaves were lost and a complaint was lodg












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top