SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 216

Shamsuddin Ahmed
Abani Kumar Pahari – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Amal Kumar Das, Ramdulal Manna

JUDGMENT

1. IN this Rule an order passed by the Revenue Officer in a proceeding under Section 14t (3) of the West bengal Land Reforms Act being T. A. Proceeding Nos. 2 32 of 80 as well as an order passed by the appellate authority against the said order passed by the Revenue Officer is under challenge.

2. THE writ petitioner's case in short is that he is the owner in occupation of 12. 89 acres of agricultural lands, 1. 2 3 of fisheries, 1. 48 acres of non-agricultural lands and 27 acres of Orchard. He has transferred some amount of land to different purchasers prior to 7. 8. 69. Altogether he was owner of 16. 05 acres of agricultural lands and some amount of fisheries and non-agricultural lands an 152. 71. His further case is that sindhubala Pahari, respondent no. 7 was the, wife of his elder brother. She is owner in occupation of 5. 44 acres of agricultural lands. She filed a suit for maintenance in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Midnapore out of the income of the properties of her. deceased husband. The suit was decreed on compromise. In terms of the said compromise the petitioner pxcuted a Registered Deed on 10. 10. 53., By the said deed Sindhubala Pahari. was conferred life





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top