SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Cal) 259

C.Mookerjee
Reyrolle Burn Limited – Appellant
Versus
ESIC – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Debesh Chandra Mukherji, Malay Kumar Ghose, Ramendra Nath Dutt, Tapas Banerjee,

JUDGMENT

1. THE petitioner-company at the material time had a factory at No. 99, Dr. Abani Dutta Road, howrah. It is undisputed that the Employees' state Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter called the said Act) applied to the said factory of the petitioner and the persons employed therein were " employees " as defined by S. 2 (9) of the said Act. The petitioner has claimed that it had been regularly depositing contributions in respect of the " wages" paid to the said employees in accordance with the provisions of the Employees' State Insurance Act.

2. ON June 8, 1970 there was a Memorandum of Settlement between the petitioner-company and its workmen for resolving outstanding disputes. The Conciliation Officer, Government of West Bengal also signed the said Memorandum of Settlement. It is not necessary for the present purpose to refer to the terms of the said settlement relating to grade, scales of pay, dearness allowance, etc. The Term No. 54 of the said settlement provided " the incentive scheme shall be as detailed in Annexure III. " the Annexure 111 to the said Memorandum of settlement contained detailed provisions relating to payment of incentive bonus both for hourly rated workers


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top