SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 48

S.K.Mukherjee
Himangshu Kumar Bose – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Madhusudan Banerji, Prasanta Kumar Ghosh,

JUDGMENT

1. THE petitioner, in this Rule has prayed for quashing of the Disciplinary proceeding, the suspension order, the charge-sheet, the report of the Enquiry Officer and, the punishment show cause notice.

2. THE instant writ application, has arisen under the facts and circumstances stated hereunder.

The petitioner, at the relevant time, had been working as a clerk in the Office of the Security Officer, Eastern Railway, Sealdah. By a memo, dated 6th march, 1976, of the Security Officer, sealdah, all documents, relating to recruitment/employment, dealt with by the petitioner, were directed to be taken over by the chief clerk, Shri R. N. Mukherjee, when the petitioner would join duty on the 8th of March, 1976. The petitioner was also served with an order of suspension issued by the Assistant Security Officer, Sealdah, in contemplation of a disciplinary proceeding. On 27th April, 1976, under the signature of the Assistant Security Officer, the petitioner was served with a charge-sheet, inter alia, alleging that the petitioner issued medical memos Nos. 274926 and 274927 dated 10th April, 1975, in favour of Ramprobesh Roy and Subhnarayan Ojha respectively, forging the signature of th











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top