SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 226

Padma Khastgir
Raj Kumar Agarwalla – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B. Giri, B.S. Bagchi for, Ram Chandra Prasad, S.K. Acharya, S. Pal

JUDGMENT

1. BEING aggrieved of and seriously prejudiced by the various orders passed by Mr. Justice b. C. Basak, the State of Bihar moved an application, before this Court for vacating the orders passed by the said learned Judge in this writ proceeding.

2. THE State of Bihar by notification imposed restriction on the movement of salt and in consequence thereof issued various orders to the effect that no conralignment of salt will be released without the counter-signature of the Special Officer, Rationing Officer or the Sub Divisional Officers. Hence the movement of salt by railways were restricted by the bihar Government.

The writ petitioner Raj Kumar Agarwalla in utter violation of such notification despatched salt to West Bengal via railways and without obtaining the necessary counter-signatures from the appropriate officers and or authorities. The Secretary, Govt, of Bihar had drawn the attention of this act of smuggling of salt to the Salt Commissioner. As a result there was direction that railway receipts should be counter signed by file officers concerned before delivery of saw to the traders which was duly communicated to all District Officers and, all Station Masters of the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top