SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 374

G.N.Ray
Sushila Bala Roy – Appellant
Versus
Madhuri Chowdhury – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Asit Kumar Bhattacharjee, Bhaskar Bhattacharya,

JUDGMENT

1. THIS Rule is directed against Order No. 114 dated Way 29, 1982 passed in Title Suit No. 165 of 1969 and order No. 10 dated May 29,1982 passed in Title Execution case No. 85 of 1981 by the learned Munsif, 5th Court, Alipore. By the said orders, the application made by the petitioner in Title Suit No. 165 of 1969 for fixing the date of hearing of the said Title Suit and the Application made by the petitioner in Title Execution Case No- 85 of 1981 for striking off the execution proceeding were disposed of by the learned munsif and both the said petitions made by the petitioner were rejected.

2. THE relevant facts relating to the said petitions may be summarised as follows:-On September 12, 1973, the opposite party filed Title suit No. 165 of 1969 against the petitioner and one Sm. Kumudini Debya for declaration of title, permanent injunction and recovery of possession. The said suit was decreed ex parte on September 12 1973. The petitioner and Sm. Kumudini Debya made an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil procedure on October 29, 1973 for setting aside the said ex parte decree and on the said application, Misc. Case No. 120 of 197 3 was started. Srm. Kumu





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top