SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Cal) 113

AMITABHA DUTTA
Rallis India Ltd – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Amaresh Chakraborty, Balai Ch. Roy, Monotosh Mukherjee, P.S. Sengupta, Tarun Roy,

JUDGMENT

1. IN this Writ petition the Petitioner Rallis India Limited (hereinafter called the Company) has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution to quash the decision dated 24/4/1981 of the 4th industrial Tribunal, West Bengal that the respondent No. 3 Sri M. M. Kundu was a workman of the Company and the subsequent order Nos. 31 and 32 dated 10/8/1961 by which the Tribunal rejected the company's prayer for adjournment and heard the case ex parte to make the Award.

2. THE respondent No. 3 Sri Kundu was appointed as a clerk under the Company in april, 1943. He became a Commerce Graduate in 1948. He was promoted to supervisory cadre on 1/12/1955 (Exts. 2 and 3) He signed the service agreement dated 15/11/1967 (Ext. 1). Sri kundu worked in the Accounts Department of the Company's Howrah factory for about two years from 1974. He signed vouchers (ext. 5) in the absence of the Factory Manager and pay sheets (ext. 6). He was not a party to the settlement dated 19/7/1974 between the Company and the staff Union (ext. 4) as he belonged to the supervisory grade. Sri Kundu was transferred to the calcutta Regional Office of the Company on 25/4/1977 and posted



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top