SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 390

A.K.Sen, A.P.Bhattacharya
Calcutta Medical Stores – Appellant
Versus
Stadmed Private Ltd – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anindya Mitra, M.P. Mahena, P.C. Ghosh, P.N. Chiatterjee, Ramendra Nath Chakravorti, Sujit Kumar Lalik

Judgment

1. THIS is an application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for committing the respondents for contempt and taking appropriate action against them. It is alleged that the respondents committed contempt of the City Civil Court at Calcutta, a court subordinate to this Court, by violating an order of injunction passed by the said court on June 28, 1976, in Suit No. 1219 of 1976 instituted by the petitioners. The application has been heard on contest on the point as to whether a Rule should be issued and a proceeding for contempt should be started by this Court or not.

2. ACCORDING to the petitioners, they were appointed the sole distributor for distribution of products of the manufacturing firm, the respondent No. 1, in certain specified areas in terms of an agreement dated May 3, 1976, but the respondents in breach of that agreement failed to distribute the products of the respondent No. 1 through the petitioners and were taking steps for appointing other distributors when they instituted the above suit and obtain an injunction restraining the respondents from appointing any distributor or from selling the product of the respondent No. 1 through anybody else other than t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top