SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Cal) 204

Burrakur Coal Co Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Regional Labour Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Dutt, Sunit Krishna Dutt, Surathi Mohan Sanyal

JUDGMENT :

1. THE only question that is involved in these two rules is whether sick wages paid by the petitioners to the workers of their collieries are to be taken into consideration for the purpose of calculating the quarterly bonus under the Coal Mines bonus Scheme (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) framed under section 5 of the Coal Mines Provident Fund, Family Pension and bonus Schemes Act, 1948, hereinafter referred to as the Act. 5. (1973) Special Civil Application No. 2466 of 1972, decided by vaidya and Dudhia, JJ., on June 20, 1973 (Unrep.). 6. (1963) Special Civil Application No. 1855 of 1962, decided by tambe and Palekar, JJ., on January 12, 1963 (Unrep.).

2. IT is not disputed that the petitioners have been paying bonus to the workers of their collieries but in calculating the bonus they did not take into consideration the wages paid to the workers for the period they were on sick leave. The respondents, the Regional Labour Commissioner and the Labour Enforcement Officer insist that such wages are to be considered in calculating the bonus payable to the workers.

In order to resolve the question it is necessary to refer to the provisions of the Scheme. Clause (b) of











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top