SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 305

N.C.Talukdar
Keshore Deo Goenka Accused – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anath Bandhu Pal, Anjali Chatterjee, Kumar Krishna Dutta, Mrityunjoy Palit

JUDGMENT

1. THIS rule is for quashing proceedings pending in the Court of Shri R. P. Roy Choudhury, Presidency Magistrate, 11th Court, Calcutta, under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused petitioner, Keshore deo Goenka in Case; No. C/998 of 1969.

2. THE facts leading to the Rule are chequered but can be put in a short compass. The parties are business men. The complainant carries on business in supplying paper cuttings to different Mills, while the accused is the chief executive and partner of Kishore and co, Agent of Orient Paper Mills Co. Ltd. of Brajaraj Nagore, Orissa. The parties are known to each other for sometime past and had several transactions before the incident in question which appears ultimately to be based on an agreement broad based upon some correspondence. On 18.1.68, the complainant filed a petition of complaint under section 420 I.P.C. against the accused in the Court of the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate, calcutta. The allegations inter alia, are that the complainant had supplied four wagons of white paper cuttings to the accused in August, 1967 and on 28. 8. 1967, after sending the last wagon when he went to the accused for the price o












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top