SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 76

S.C.GHOSH
Municipal Commissioners of The Budge Budge Municipality 24-Paraganas – Appellant
Versus
Seventh Industrial Tribunal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. THIS is an application made in the constitutional Writ Jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of Constitution of India, inter alia, for the issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari to the respondent No. 1 Seventh Industrial tribunal requiring it to transmit and certify to this Court the records of the preceedings had before it in connection with the dispute between the petitioners Municipal Commissioners and Prafulla Kumar Chakravarty of budge Budge, 24-Parganas and the award published by the said respondent no. 1 in the Calcutta Gazette on the 4th day of March, 1965, in connection with the said dispute and for quashing and setting aside the said award, for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus upon the respondents to forbear and refrain from giving any effect to the said award and from enforcing or taking any step to enforce the same and for further or other reliefs.

2. THE facts leading to the present application are as follows :

Upon a report made by the local Auditor under the Accountant general, West Bengal on or about July 11, 1963, that there was a defalcation of Rs. 11,524-96 np. by respondent No. 3, the respondent No. 3 was charged by the Chair













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top