SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 209

High Court Of Calcutta
Banerjee, J.
Nilkantha Padma – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent
Decided On: August 26, 1965

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Bidyut Kumar Banerjee, Bireswar Bhattacharji, N.C.Chakravarti, Ranjit Kumar Banerjee, Shaktinath Mukherjee

A notification issued under Section 4 of the West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, is not invalid merely because it does not expressly declare the area specified in the notification to be a "notified area", provided that the area specified is reasonably clear and the notification expressly states that it is made under Section 4 of the Act.

Headnote:

WEST BENGAL LAND DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING ACT, 1948 - SECTION 4 - NOTIFICATION OF NOTIFIED AREA - INTERPRETATION - DEFECTIVE LANGUAGE IN NOTIFICATION - NOT FATAL TO NOTIFICATION.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged a notification issued by the State Government under Section 4 of the West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, on the ground that it did not expressly declare the area specified in the notification to be a "notified area" as required by the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the notification was not in strict compliance with the language of Section 4 of the Act, but that the lacuna in the language used was not so bad as to prove fatal to the notification.

Issues: Whether the notification issued by the State Government under Section 4 of the West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, was valid despite the absence of an express declaration of the area specified in the notification as a "notified area".

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 4 of the Act and held that the purpose of a notification under the section was to declare a "notified area". The court found that the area specified in the notification was reasonably clear and that the notification expressly stated that it was made under Section 4 of the Act. The court held that the defective language used in the notification was not so bad as to prove fatal to the notification.

Final Decision: The court discharged the rule issued against the State Government and upheld the validity of the notification.

JUDGMENT

1. THE West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, is an Act to provide for the acquisition and development of land for public purposes. Section 4 of the Act provides for declaration of a notified area in the following language : -

"4 (1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare any area specified in. the notification to be a notified area if it is satisfied that any land in such area is needed or is likely to be needed for any public purpose and the Collector shall cause public notice of the substance of such notification to be given at convenient places in the locality in such manner as he may think fit. (2) "

Section 2 (c) of the Act defines notified area as:-"notified area means an area declared under Sub-section (1) of Section 4 to be a notified area. " In exercise of the powers vested in it under section 4 of the Act, the respondent State Government published the following notification in the extraordinary issue of the Calcutta Gazette, dated November 9, 1962. "hooghly.-No. 14396l, Dev, 9th November, 1962,-Whereas it appears to the Governor that land is likely to be needed for a public purpose, viz., for the settlement of immigrants who have migrated into the State of West Bengal on account of circumstances beyond their control in the village of Kotrang, jurisdiction list No. 8, police station Uttarpara, district Hooghly, it is hereby notified that for the above purpose a piece of land comprising cadastral survey plots (plots numbers omitted) and portions of cadastral survey plots (plots numbers omitted) and altogether measuring more or less 72. 878 acres, is likely to be required within the aforesaid village of Kotrang.

2. THIS notification is made under the provisions of Section 4 of the West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948 (West Bengal Act XXI of 1948) to all whom it may concern. The petitioner alleges to be the owner of three of the plots of land mentioned in the notification. He finds fault with the notification on the theory that the notification is not in accordance with the provisions of section 4 of the Act, in that there has been no declaration of a ''notified area" made by the notification. With the aforesaid grievances, the petitioner has moved this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to withdraw and to cancel the notification and has obtained this Rule. The point raised in this Rule is technically attractive. Section 4 of the Act requires the State Government to "declare any area specified in the notification to be a notified area". What the impugned notification has done is that it has specified an area in the notification but has not expressly declared the area specified to be the notified area. This is technically not in strict compliance with the language of Section 4 of the Act.

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Banerjee, learned Advocate for the petitioner, argued that since hearing of objections under Section 4a, preparation and sanction of development schemes under section 5, declaration of acquisition of land needed for development schemes under section 6 of the Act have all to be made with reference to the "notified area" absence of declaration as to "notified area" made further proceedings under the notification unworkable. He, therefore, argued that such a notification should not be allowed to stand. I have already expressed opinion that the impugned notification is not in strict compliance with the language of section 4 of the Act. I can think of one reason why it is not so. The impugned notification is of the type issued under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894f which, however, is couched in a different language as set out below:-

(1)"Whenever it appears to the appropriate Government, that land in any locality is needed or is likely to be needed for any public purpose, a notification to that effect shall be published in the Official gazette and the Collector shall cause publi



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top