SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 11

BANERJEE, MASUD
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Dass Sadani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sabyasachi Mukherji, Gouri Mitter, A.N.Gupta

JUDGMENT

BANERJEE, J.

1. This is a reference under s. 27(1) of the WT Act, made under circumstances hereinafter stated.

2. The assessee is one Narayandass (alias Naraindas) Sadani. He has a one-half share in three immovable properties in Calcutta. The other one-half share belongs to his brother, Ramnarayan Sadani. The assessment years in question are 1957-58 and 1958-59 and the corresponding valuation dates are Akshaya Tritia day of 2014 and 2015 S. Y. The point in dispute is the status in which the assessee is to be assessed to wealth-tax. The assessee is the son of one Amarchand and grandson of one Lachmandas. Lachmandas was a Hindu governed by the Mitakshara school. Amarchand was his only son. Amarchand had five sons, viz., (1) Sewnarain (2) Harnarain, (3) Ramnarain, (4) Naraindas and (5) Lachminarayan. The last- mentioned son was born in the year 1934. Amarchand used to do business in the name of Lachmandas Amarchand, as the sole proprietor, and owned several properties in Calcutta and Bikaner. It is not disputed that the business and the properties were self-acquired in the hands of Amarchand. On 4th May, 1927, when Amarchand had only four sons born to him, he executed three de































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top