SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 160

BANERJEE, K.L.ROY
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Biman Behari Shaw Shebait – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.N.Ghosh, B.L.Pal

JUDGMENT

BANERJEE, J.

1. This reference, under s. 66(2) of the Indian IT Act, 1922, has been made in circumstances hereinafter stated. The assessment years with which we are concerned are years 1957- 58 and 1958-59.

2. One Banku Bahari Saha executed a will on November 24, 1925, and thereby intended to found a debutter estate. He dedicated several properties to two deities installed by him, namely, Sri Sri Iswar Benode Behari Jew and Sri Sri Iswar Benodeswar Mahadev. In this reference we are concerned with two of the dedicated properties, namely, No. 12, Benode Behari Saha Lane, and No. 122A, Manicktola Street, both in the town of Calcutta. It is necessary for us to consider the following clauses of the will, in order to understand the question referred to this Court. The dedication opens with the following paragraph :

"According to the wishes of my revered father I have built the edifice of a temple, a Thakurabari a premisses No. 12, Benode Behari Saha Lane, in close proximity to our said family dwelling house and have installed therein the deity of Sri Sri Iswar Benode Behari (an image of Sri Sri Iswar Radha Krishna) and Sri Sri Iswar Bendeswari Sina (possibly a misprint for Sri Sr


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top