SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 155

B.N.Banerjee
Bagsu Devi Bafna – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income-Tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C. Mitra, N. Khaitan, E.R. Meyer, Sabyasachi Mukherji

Judgment

B.N. Banerjee, J.

1. THE petitioner feels aggrieved by an order of revision of assessment of her income, made under Section 33-B of the Income-tax Act, 1922, by the respondent Commissioner of Income-tax, for the assessment years 1953-54 to 1961-62.

2. THE circumstances under which the revision of assessment was made are briefly as hereinafter stated. THE assessee filed voluntary returns of income for the assessment years 1953-54 to 1959-60 and also for the year 1960-61, all in the year 1961. One Mr. H. Upadhaya, who was at the material time the Income Tax Officer, B-Ward, 24 Parganas, assessed the petitioner for the assessment year 1953-54 to a total income of Rs. 5,000 in the manner hereinafter quoted: "Seen return. In response to notice under Section 23 (2) authorised representative Shri C.M. Chopra appears and the case is discussed. Evidences produced are also examined. Assessee was married about 30 years ago and received certain gifts and presents in cash, which is customary. With that she did pawn-broking business. A/cs are not maintained properly. She has no bank account. Assessed under 23 (3) as below:

Income from business estimated Rs. 3,000


Out of Initial capital,

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top