Bijayesh Mukherji
Sudhangshu Kumar Saha – Appellant
Versus
Pravalata Nandy – Respondent
1. THE point for decision in this rule obtained by an opposite party, one successfully pre-empted, is whether or no section 24 of the West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act 20 of 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) avails a co-sharer non-agricultural under-tenant part of whose undivided! tenancy has been transferred by another co-sharer non-agricultural under-' tenant. The facts are not in dispute. Pra-valata Nandi, Jibandhan Chatterjee and Benoy Krishna Chatterjee are owners in equal shares of. 096 acres of non-agricultural land in the town of Chan-dernagore spread over plots 363 and 364 under Khatian No. 212 on a rental of Rs. 5 /and also over a bata dag, 364/851 under Khatian No. 374, a khatian subordinate to khatian No. 212, on a rental of Rs. 36/ -. Their status is that of a dakhalkar under a dakhalkar, in other words, that of an under-tenant. Plot No. 363 is recorded as a dokan (a shop), plot No. 364 as a danga and the bata dag as a bastu. Jibandhan sells his one-third share to a stranger Tulsidas Kar for Rs. 1,330 / The date of the sale is November 11, 1960. Pravalata thereupon moves the court for pre-emption under section 24 of the Act, wrongly described in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.