SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 191

BACHAWAT, CHATTERJEE
Manindra Nath Sadhukhan – Appellant
Versus
Biswanath Kundu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Apurbadhan Mukherjee, D.K. Mukherjee, Gurudas Ghose, K.P. Sinha, S.B. Bhuniya.

JUDGMENT

1. THE defendant opposite party filed in the court below three petitions namely, (1) a petition dated 15-2-61 for a direction upon the plaintiff to admit certain facts and in default to permit the defendant to prove those facts by means of a tape recorder machine and demonstrate by mechanical process the records of an alleged conversation, (2) a petition dated 19-4-61 for an order allowing the defendant to adduce in evidence the results of alleged discussion and telephonic conversation with the plaintiff said to have been recorded in a tape recorder machine and to prove and demonstrate records before the court at the time of the hearing of the suit, (3) a petition dated 3-6-61 for an order allowing the defendant to file three reels of tapes in court and take the same back and keep them in a vault. On June 3, 1961 the defendant filed three reels of tapes in the court below. On the same day the court directed that in view of the circumstances stated in the petition dated June 3, 1961 the tape recordings he returned to the filing pleader and fixed the 8th June 1961 for orders on the defendant's petition dated February 15, 1961 and April 19, 1961. The plaintiff raised objectio



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top