SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 63

G.K.MITTER, A.N.RAY
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Nath Mallick – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
E.R. Meyer, B.L. Pal, R.B. Pal, S.N. Modak

JUDGMENT

G.K. MITTER, J.

1. IN this reference the point of issue is whether a trust deed was executed by the assessee contains a provision for the retransfer directly or indirectly of the income or assets of the trust property to him or in any way gives him a right to reassume power directly or indirectly over the said income or assets. It was argued on behalf of the Revenue that the trust deed contains more than one such provision by reason whereof the transfer of assets to the trustees can be said to be revocable within the meaning of s. 16(1)(c) of the Indian IT Act and all income from the trust property must be deemed to be the income of the assessee and taxed as such.

2. THE settlor in this case owned valuable immovable properties situate in Calcutta and elsewhere. Being minded to settle these for the benefit of himself, his three sons, one being unmarried, and two daughters-in-law, he executed a deed of trust on 10th Aug., 1949, under which he along with his sons became the trustees. The properties described in the schedule to the deed are the trust properties subject to the conditions laid down in cl. (5) of the document. The deed recites that the settlor was possessed of the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top