SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Cal) 118

BANERJEE
Ramesh Behabi Ghose – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Balai Lal Pal, Nani Coomar Chakraborty, Subhash Chandra Bhattacharji,

JUDGMENT

1. For the assessment year 1947-48, 1he petitioner was assessed under the head "capital Gains", on a sum of Rs. 35,300/-, being the sale proceeds of premises No. 2, Sadananda Road. The tax assessed on the aforesaid sum was calculated at Rs. 2,256/13/ -.

2. For realisation of the tax as assessed, certificate Case No. 2819 I. T, of 1951-52 was started against the petitioner before the Certificate Officer, 24-Parganas, under the provisions of the Public Demands Recovery Act read with section 46 (2) of the Indian Income -Tax Act.

The petitioner filed a suit, being Title Suit No. 34 of 1955, in the First Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore, for a declaration that the assessment was illegal and also for a declaration that the certificate proceeding and the orders passed thereunder were inoperative and without jurisdiction and for an injunction restraining the opposite party herein from proceeding with the certificate. The suit succeeded to a limited extent. The learned Subordinate Judge declared that the certificate proceeding, on the basis of the notice under section 7 of the Public Demands Recovery Act, offended against the provisions of the public Demands Recovery Act i














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top