SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 83

Harrier, Sinha
Isthmian Steamship Lines – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT

HARRIES, C.J.

1. THIS is a reference made by the Tribunal under s. 66 of the Indian IT Act at the instance of the assessees. The question which has been formulated for the opinion of this Court is as follows :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of this case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the unabsorbed depreciation of the end of the year 1938-39, which was not given effect to in the subsequent years, could not be treated as part of the allowable depreciation for the relevant assessment years which are asst. yrs. 1941-42, 1942-43 and 1943-44."

2. THE assessees, M/s Isthmian Steamship Co. of New York, are assessed in India as a company through their agents, M/s Angus Co. Ltd. In the three relevant assessment years which are referred to in the question as also for the asst. yr. 1940-41, the unabsorbed depreciation as at the end of the asst. yr. 1938- 39 was not allowed to be carried forward by the ITO. For the asst. yr. 1940-41 the assessees did not appeal against this order and that assessment became final. In the three assessments from 1941 onwards three appeals were filed and the assessees contended that their unabsorbed depreciation at the end of the as












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top