SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 95

Chakrabarti, Bachawat
Asit Kumar Ghose – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.B. Pal, J.M. Banerjee, A.K. Sen

Judgment

CHAKRAVARTTI, J.

1. THE proceeding which has led to this Reference gave rise to an important and attractive question of law, but unfortunately it suffered such drastic pruning at the hands of the Tribunal in the course of their editing of it that it has reached this Court only in a very attenuated and even misleading form. THE parties, however, agreed that the question might be reframed in order that its real basis and meaning might be brought out.

2. THE facts are as follows :One Akshoy Kumar Ghose died in October, 1931, leaving a will under which three persons were to be executors and trustees. Of them two obtained a probate of the will and took upon themselves the administration of the estate. In May, 1933, one Asit Kumar Ghose, who is the assessee before us, was adopted to the testator. In 1947 Asit Kumar brought a suit against the executors on the Original Side of this Court for administration of the estate and accounts and in that suit he was appointed receiver by an order made on the 12th Aug., 1948. He took possession of the estate on the 23rd August next and it is found by the Tribunal that all the assets of the estate were handed over to him, except that the execut




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top