SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 178

Chakrabarti, Lahiri
Kaniram Hazarimull – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Atul Gupta, A.C. Sen, E.R. Meyer, B.L. Pal

Judgment

CHAKRAVARTTI, C.J.

1. WE have felt some difficulty in dealing with this reference because of the form in which the question was referred or caused to be referred and because of the meaning which was sought to be attributed to it on behalf of the assessee.

2. THE assessee is an HUF, called Kaniram Hazarimull and one Indra Chand Kejriwal is its Karta. On the 18th April, 1933, Indra Chand entered into a partnership with eight other persons for the purpose of floating and obtaining the managing agency of a proposed mill to be called the Shankar Sugar Mills Limited. Clause 4 of the deed of partnership provided that the partnership capital was to be Rs. 12,00,000 to be contributed by the partners in accordance with their shares, that it would be applied by each partner to the purchasing or getting to be purchased shares of the proposed mill according to his share specified in the deed and that one-third of the share money was to be paid within a month and the remaining two-thirds on such dates as might be decided later. Clause 7 of the deed provided that the profits of the partnership would be ascertained and distributed between the partners according to their shares on the 30th S






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top