SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 13

Harrier, Banerjee
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
P. M. Bagchi And Co. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.B. Pal, S.K. Gupta, J.C. Pal

Judgment

HARRIES, C.J.

1. THIS is a reference made by the Tribunal at the instance of the CIT, West Bengal, in which the Court is asked to express its opinion upon the following question :-

"Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding that in the assessment of the income for the asst. yr. 1938-39, s. 23(5)(a) which was introduced in the Indian IT Act in 1939 was applicable ?"

2. THE Tribunal had held that the section was applicable disagreeing with the view of the ITO and the AAC. The assessee was a firm, P. M. Bagchi and Co., which had been in existence for some time though its constitution had changed. In the year 1937 a receiver was in possession of the partnership assets on behalf of the then partners. On 16th Dec., 1937, the receiver sold the right, title and interest of these three partners in the business and the present assessees purchased. The year of assessment is the year 1938-39 the accounting year being 1937-38. There was difficulty in the assessment as the tax authorities claimed that certain income had escaped assessment and should be assessed under s. 34 of the Indian IT Act. Eventually an assessment was made on 31st March, 1943










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top