SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Cal) 102

P.N.Mukherjee
Saibalini Saha – Appellant
Versus
Snehalata Bose – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Kumar Sen, Apurbadhan Mukherjee, Nani Coomar Chakraborty,

JUDGMENT

1. THESE two second appeals arise out of two suits for ejectment. Second Appeal No. 1276 of 1955, arises out of Title Suit No. 463 of 1952 of the Second Additional Court of the Munsif at Alipore and the corresponding Title Appeal No. 587 of 1954 of the Court of the Additional District Judge. Alipore (Second Extra Court). The other Second Appeal No. 1433 of 1955 arises out of the analogous Title Suit No. 464 of 1952 and the corresponding Title Appeal No. 588 of 1954.

2. BOTH the above suits, which were heard together, were decreed by the learned Munsif, but, on appeal, Title Suit No. 462 of 1952 was dismissed, the corresponding Title Appeal No. 587 of 1954 being allowed, and against this appellate decision, the plaintiff has preferred the corresponding Second Appeal (Second Appeal No. 1276 of 1955). The decree of the learned Munsif in the other Title Suit No. 464 of 1952 was, however, affirmed by the lower Appellate Court in Title Appeal No. 588 of 1954, and the defendant has preferred the corresponding Second Appeal No. 1433 of 1935 from this appellate decree.


The two suits, as I have said above, were suits for ejectment. They were in respect of two different portions of pr













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top