SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 48

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
G. N. DAS,LAHIRI, JJ.
Governor-General in Council
Versus
Corporation of Calcutta
A.F.O.D. No. 149 of 1947
Decided On : 30-03-1949

Advocates:
Chandra Sekhar Sen and Provas Kumar Sen Gupta - for Appellant.Krishnalal Banerjee - for Respondent.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the assessment of premises should be made in accordance with the actual or intended user of the building, and the assessment under the Calcutta Municipal Act III [3] of 1923 should align with the provisions of S. 127(a) and S. 127(b).

Headnote:

Calcutta Municipal Act - Assessment of Premises - S. 141, Calcutta Municipal Act III [3] of 1923 - S. 140 - S. 138 - S. 127(a) - S. 127(b) - S. 131(2)(d) - S. 150

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, Dominion of India, representing the East Indian Railways, appeals against an order dismissing an appeal regarding the assessment of Premises No. 52, Gopal Chandra Chatterjee Road under the Calcutta Municipal Act III [3] of 1923.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the assessment made by the Corporation under S. 127(a) was illegal and must be set aside. The appeal succeeded, and the assessment made by the Second Deputy Executive Officer and the order of the Judge of the Court of Small Causes Sealdah were vacated.

Issues: The main issue was the correctness of the assessment under S. 127(a) and whether it should have been made under S. 127(b) of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the assessment should have been made under S. 127(b) as the building was not erected for letting purposes or ordinarily let. The assessment made under S. 127(a) was deemed illegal, and the Corporation was directed to reassess the premises.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was entitled to costs in the Court.

Judgement

DAS, J. The appellant, Dominion of India, representing the East Indian Railways, [formerly Bengal Assam Railway] appeals to this Court under S. 141, Calcutta Municipal Act III [3] of 1923 [hereinafter called the Act] against an order dated 30th June 1947, passed by Mr. R.N. Ray, learned Small Cause Court Judge, Sealdah, District 24 Parganas, whereby he dismissed an appeal against the order of the second Deputy Executive Officer, Corporation of Calcutta, dated 11th April 1946, under S. 140 of the Act in respect of the assessment of Premises No. 52, Gopal Chandra Chatterjee Road.

2. The B.A. Railway [Bengal Assam Railway] was the owner and occupier of premises No. 52, Gopal Chandra Chatterjee Road, measuring 83 Bighas, 9 Kottaha 6 chhataks and 14 sq. ft., and was paying Rs. 3004-12-0 per annum on account of municipal rates and taxes to the Corporation of Calcutta, hereinafter called the Corporation.

3. By a memorandum, Ex. 4, the B.A. Railway let out to the Civil Supply Department the aforesaid premises for one year subject to further extensions, as may be agreed upon; the relevant provision runs as follows :

2. The Civil Supply Department shall be liable to pay to the Bengal Assam Railway Administration a sum of Rs. 60,096-4-0 per annum on account of rent for occupation of the above land. The Civil Supply Departments shall also pay a sum of Rs. 3004-12-0 per annum on account of Municipal tax which the Railway Administration is paying to the Calcutta Corporation. The Civil Supply Department shall be (sic) also pay other taxes or ancillary charges which the Railway Administration may have to pay to any local authorities or any ether body in connection with the said plot of land and/or structures thereon. It is now admitted that thereafter the Civil Supply Department erected certain godowns and other structures at its own cost and for its own use. This is also supported by the uncontradicted evidence adduced by the appellant.

4. In September 1945, the Corporation served the following notice, Ex. 3, on the appellant :

Corporation of Calcutta ; Assessment Department.

Special Notice under S. 138 of Bengal Act III [3] of 1923.

The owner of Premises No. 52, Gopal Chandra Chatterjee Road.

Take notice that the above premises have been assessed at an annual value of Rs. 3,71,520 and the said valuation is to remain in force from the commencement of the 3rd quarter of 1945-46 until the expiration of the period of assessment of the ward within which the above premises are situated, viz., the 4th quarter of 1948-1949.

Grounds of increase,

Valuation of the new structures on estimated yearly rental value leas statutory allowance for repairs.

Municipal Office S. M. Hossain

Dated 11th September, 1945. Acting Assessor to the Corporation.

5. The following grounds of objections were then raised to the said proposed assessment :

(i) That the entire revaluation is ultra vires, illegal and inoperative :

(ii) that the additional constructions which are sought to be assessed are not liable under the law to be assessed ;

(iii) that the entire principle and basis of assessment are wrong and not warranted by the law ; and

(iv) that the taxes demanded on the assessment are patently disproportionate to the services rendered.

6. It would appear from EX. A(1) that the Executive Engineer of the B.A. Railway admitted that the approximate cost of construction of the godown and structures was Rs. 35,90,000 only [excluding costs of land].

7. The second Deputy Executive Officer by his order dated 11th April 1946, Ex. 2(a), reduced the valuation to Rs. 3,22,930.

8. The details of valuation are as follows :

Corporation of Calcutta ; Assessment Department.

Statement of Details of Valuation.

Intermediate Re-valuation with effect from the 3rd quarter of 45-46. Premises No. 52, Gopal Chandra Chatterjee Road.

33000 x 12 ... ... 396000

10% ... ... 39600

__________

356400

Land about

10 B @ 1/-

p. k. p. m.... ... 2400

-------------

358800

10% ... ... 35880

-------------

3229
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top