SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 45

G.N.DAS, LAHIRI
Dawoo Doyal Kothari – Appellant
Versus
Giridhari Laha – Respondent


Advocates:
Hemanta Kumar Bose - for Petitioner.Panchanon Ghose, Probodh Kumar Shome and Benoy Kumar Ghose - for Opposite Party.

Judgement

LAHIRI, J. :- This Rule was obtained by the plaintiff landlord in a proceeding under S. 41, Presidency Small Cause Court Act for the recovery of possession of room No. 27 of premises No. 57 Clive Street of which the opposite party was a monthly tenant at a rent of Rs. 75 per month. The facts of the case, which are undisputed, ace as follows : the present proceeding was started on 7th March 1945, inter alia, on the ground of default in payment of rent after service of a notice to quit and on 27th July 1945 it was decreed on consent in favour of the landlord. On 29th August 1945, the Calcutta House Rent Control Order was amended by the insertion of para. 9B which inter alia provided by sub-para. (3) that where any decree or order for recovery of possession had been made before 29th August 1945 on the ground of default in payment or deposit of rent but possession had not been recovered, the proceeding for recovery of possession in execution of the decree or order shall be stayed till 29th September 1945 and if during that period the tenant made an application for setting aside the decree or order and deposited all arrears of rent and costs within such period as might be allow






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top