Kedar Nath Mukherjee vs Iswar Kalimata of Kalighat

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

1949 Supreme(Cal) 225

HARRIES, BANERJEE
Kedar Nath Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
Iswar Kalimata of Kalighat – Respondent

Advocates:
Hiralal Chakravarty and Saroj Kumar Maity - for Appellants.
Pannalal Chatterjee - for Deputy Registrar and Respondent 1.
Nagendra Kumur Dutt, Satya Charan Pyne, Ajoy Kumar Bose, Nalini Ranjan Bhattacharjya and Subodh Chandra Basak - for Respondents.

Judgement

HARRIES, C.J. :-In this case it is conceded that the value of the suit and the value of the appeal exceed Rs. 10,000. The appeal was allowed in part and portion of the decree of the trial Court was vacated.

2. In these circumstances it appears to us; that the decree of this Court is not a decree of affirmance but is a decree varying the decree of the Court below. That being so the appellants are entitled as of right to a certificate and accordingly we grant leave to appeal and grant as certificate under S. 110, Civil P.C.

3. Costs of this application will be costs in the appeal the hearing fee being assessed at two gold mohurs. 4. Let the supplementary affidavit filed in Court today be kept on the record.

BANERJEE, J. :- I agree.

Leave granted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document