SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 114

CHATTERJEE
Babulal Dhandhania – Appellant
Versus
Gauttam – Respondent


Advocates:
K.K. Basu - for Petitioner.R.S. Bachawat - for Respondent.

ORDER :- This is an application by the petitioner Babulal Dhandhania for setting aside an award made by the Bengal Chamber of Commerce, dated 6th April 1949.

2. On 9th March 1943, the respondent Gauttam and Co. bought from the petitioner 2,000 maunds of linseed oil at Ss. 33 per maund. The terms of the contract will appear from Bought Note No. 2957, a copy of which is annexed to the petition.

3. There was a clause that any dispute regarding the contract was to be settled by arbitration of the Bengal Chamber of Commerce in Calcutta. The petitioner failed to deliver the goods in time and it is alleged by the respondent that at the request of the petitioner the time for delivery was extended from time to time till 21st July 1948.

4. The petitioner delivered certain quantities but failed to deliver about 1056 maunds. The time for delivery was further extended till 25th August 1948. Yet the petitioner failed and neglected to give delivery. According to the petitioner there was a frustration of the contract. But the respondent alleged that the real reason for non-delivery was that the market had gone against the petitioner and he wanted to avoid delivery.

5. On 19th October 1948, the respond





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top