SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 150

HARRIES, BOSE
Kalipada Das – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
babrata Mookerjee with Ajay Kumar Basu - for Appellant; Bansorilal Sarkar - for the State.

Judgement

Harries, C. J. :- These are two connected revisions which can be disposed of by this judgment.

2. Criminal Revision No. 425 of 1950 is a petition for revision of an order directing the prosecution of the petitioner under s. 188, Penal Code, for breach of an order made by the Sub-Divisional Officer of Uluberia under S. 144, Criminal P. C.

3. Criminal Revision 493 of 1950 is a petition for revision of an order directing the prosecution of the petitioner and three others on a charge of theft.

4. It appears that in the year 1940, the petitioner and his brothers leased from the Burdwan Raj the right to remove sand from sand banks in the Rupnarayan River. This lease gave them a right to remove sand at three points within the area of Police Station Daspur in the district of Midnapore. The lease was originally for three years, but has been renewed from time to time.

5.It seems that one Nalini Mohan Biswas leased the right to take sand from the Rupnarayan River (from?) the Collector of Howrah and in June of 1949, the petitioner applied to a Magistrate in the Midnapore district for an order under s.144, Criminal P. C.,restraining Biswas from taking sand from these areas in the Rupnaraya

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top