SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 154

HARRIES, BOSE
Mohammad Illias – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Debabrata Mookerjee - for Appellant; Ajit Kumar Dutta - for the State.

Judgement

Harries, C.J. :- The appellant in this case was tried by a learned Additional Sessions Judge sitting with a jury upon two charges of murder. The jury found the appellant guilty on both the charges by a majority. Five of the jurors found the appellant guilty under S. 302, Penal Code, on both the charges: two found the appellant guilty not under S. 302, Penal Code, but under S. 304 on both the charges, whereas the remaining two jurors found the appellant not guilty on both the charges. The learned Additional Sessions Judge accepted the majority verdict of guilty under S. 302, Penal Code, and sentenced the appellant to transportation for life in respect of the charge of murdering one Golam Hossain. He did not think it was necessary to sentence the appellant in respect of the other charge of murder upon which the jury by a majority had found the appellant guilty.

2. The case for the prosecution was that the appellant had murdered two persons, namely, Golam Hossain and Safatunnessa Bibi by shooting them early in the morning of 1-6-1948. The case was that the appellant fired one shot which killed both these persons and the appellant was charged in separate counts in respect of th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top