P.B.MUKHARJI
Manicklall Dutt – Appellant
Versus
S. Dabiruddin Ahmed – Respondent
2. The claim in the suit proceeds on the basis that the defendant was a monthly tenant in respect of the said premises at a rent of Rs. 106-4-0 per month. It is said that the defendant failed and neglected to pay or deposit rent of the said premises for the months of May, June and July 1949, and, therefore, by reason of S. 12 (3) of Act of 1948 the tenancy came to an end ipso facto.
3. The written statement in this suit was filed on 13-12-1949, and the main defence is that there was an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant to excuse or waive the defaults on the ground of settling a higher rent.
4. Mr. A. S. Huq learned counsel appearing for the defendant, raises the issue that the defendant is entitled to the relief under S. 18 (5), West Bengal Prem
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.