SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 196

HARRIES, BANERJEE
Bengal Bank – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Chakravartty – Respondent


Advocates:
S.C. Mitter and K.K. Basu, for Appellant; R. Chowdhury and M. Hazra, for Respondents.

Judgement

BANERJEE, J. :- This is an appeal from an order made on June 15, 1950, by Bachawat, J., refusing to sanction a scheme. The Company in question is the Bengal Bank Ltd. which was incorporated in 1926 under the Indian Companies Act. The petition under S. 153 was first presented to this Court on or about December 9, 1949, on which day preliminary directions under that section were given.

2. The Bank has twenty branches. Five of the branches are in Pakistan and the remaining fifteen are within the State of West Bengal. The authorised capital of the Company is Rs. 25,00,000/-. The paid up capital is Rs. 11,70,000/-. It carries on business as a Bank in India as well as in Pakistan. Its registered office and principal place of business is in India. The majority of the depositors are within the Union of India. Notice of the application has not been given to the creditors in Pakistan.

3. Section 153 of the Indian Companies Act deals with the right of Companies to enter into a compromise or arrangement, (a) between itself and its creditors or any class of them, or (b) between itself and its members or any class of them. The procedure is as follows. First of all an application has to be














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top