ROXBOURGH
Debendra Nath Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Parul Bala Ghosh – Respondent
2. In previous cases disposed of by me the facts were that the tenants had applied to the Court even before the landlord had sought through Court to obtain possession of the premises, and I have pointed out that such applications are premature. I have also pointed out that in my opinion the sub-tenant has a remedy under the provisions of O.21, R.97 to R.100, Civil P.C. which are made applicable to these proceedings of the Calcutta Court of Small Causes under S.49 (sic), Calcutta Small Causes Court Act.
3. In the present case, the landlord had obtained possession of some of the premises in pursuance of his order against his tenant but in respect of one room and kitchen held by opposite party 2 he was resisted by opposite party 2 and did not obtain possession. Opposite party 2 then went to Court and stated
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.